AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Git blame history12/30/2023 ![]() ![]() Hence, we saw that git blame is a very useful command in inspecting a repository. Step 2: The structure of output is described in the image below : labeled picture of blame option on GitHub. One can blame the previous version with on any commit or view the commit with the Enter key. Step 1: Navigate to the file for which you want to see the modification history and click on the Blame option as shown below. The first one can be triggered with :Git blame It opens a window on the left showing the last editor of the current line. Using such a curve can help an analyst choose a cut-off point which will prevent most misclassifications, at the cost of causing the rejection of some of the more dubious correct attributions. git blame is available in two versions in current fugitive. This is because the calibration curves allow us to identify which samples are more likely to have been correctly attributed. Seamlessly explore Git repositories with the visually-rich Commit Graph. Visualize code authorship at a glance via Git blame annotations and Git CodeLens. We show that we can also use these calibration curves in the case that we do not have linking information and thus are forced to classify individual samples directly. Zero-in on the most important changes and effortlessly navigate through history to gain further insights as to how a file or individual line's code evolved. Additionally, we propose the use of calibration curves to identify samples by unknown and previously unencountered authors in the open world setting. ![]() Through these results, we demonstrate that attribution is an important threat to privacy for programmers even in real-world collaborative environments such as GitHub. We show that while application of previous methods to individual small source code samples yields an accuracy of about 73% for 106 programmers as a baseline, by ensembling and averaging the classification probabilities of a sufficiently large set of samples belonging to the same author we achieve 99% accuracy for assigning the set of samples to the correct author. What if, instead of the commits that touch a specific file, youre interested in the history of specific lines in a file This is where git blame comes in. We propose a technique for authorship attribution of contributor accounts containing small source code samples, such as those that can be obtained from version control systems or other direct comparison of sequential versions. While previous work has shown that complete files that are individually authored can be attributed, we show here for the first time that accounts belonging to open source contributors containing short, incomplete, and typically uncompilable fragments can also be effectively attributed. Download a PDF of the paper titled Git Blame Who?: Stylistic Authorship Attribution of Small, Incomplete Source Code Fragments, by Edwin Dauber and 6 other authors Download PDF Abstract:Program authorship attribution has implications for the privacy of programmers who wish to contribute code anonymously.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |